Many people who live in America came from Mexico and thus speak Spanish as a first language. This level was from age thirteen to fifteen, where they continued studying and memorizing the entire Tanach (in other words, the complete Old Testament). The only complete biblical book among the Dead Sea Scrolls. Therefore the Jews didnt consider them part of the accepted canon of the time. The first was the Palestine canon which is identical to the Protestant Old Testament. Roman Catholic Bibles have 73 books rather than 66. This includes the four Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles, and the Book of Revelation. Later Councils at Hippo (393 AD) and Carthage (397 AD) ratified this list of 73 books. No. The Roman Catholic Bible also has additions to the books of Esther and Daniel. Skip to main content Menu: Top Buttons. It is a revised version of the Christian Bible produced by Martin Luther and the protestants. Again, this isnt evidence of anything per say, but it doesnt mean you cannot use quotes by Jesus or the Apostles to prove the authority of the Dueterocanon. During which time it was under control of the Greek empire of King Seleucus, and eventually taken by the roman empire in 31BC. This is because Roman Catholics have 7 additional books in their Old Testament: Tobit, Judith, 1-2 Maccabees, Wisdom . The Septuagint was a Greek translation by 70 translators of the Hebrew Word. For we have not an innumerable multitude of books among us, disagreeing from and contradicting one another, [as the Greeks have,] but only twenty-two books, which contain the records of all the past times; which are justly believed to be divine; It is true, our history hath been written since Artaxerxes very particularly, but hath not been esteemed of the like authority with the former by our forefathers, because there hath not been an exact succession of prophets since that time. He also says that only the 22 books were read openly in the Church, which would indicate the deuterocanonical books werent. The Old Testament contains 39 (Protestant), 46 (Catholic), or more (Orthodox and other) books, divided, very broadly, into the Pentateuch (Torah), the historical books, the "wisdom" books and the prophets.. How many books are in the Old and New Testament KJV? So, there you go. For I was not relating my own personal views, but rather the remarks that they [the Jews] are wont to make against us. What about the Apostles? They were included in our Bibles for more than 1500 years. There is a legend surrounding its creation/translation and few people would take it literally. http://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/fall-of-ancient-egypt.html. In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria. My father once told me to pay attention to the assumptions behind any statement. In about 367 AD, St. Athanasius came up with a list of 73 books for the Bible that he believed to be divinely inspired. Honestly, the strongest evidence of this comes from Maccabees. It is noted that Catholicism recognizes those dogmas that Orthodoxy does not consider to be true. 21 Terms. After these prophets died, God stopped speaking as Amos predicted. (Parenthetical statements and emphasis added.). Would the Pharisees have let the Septuagint be read in a synagogue since it was create by disobeying the explicit command of God? They had a real divine right to say just WHICH books Christians included in their Bible. So this argument as to WHY the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonicals should NOT be included in the Bible is really pointless. It turns out God Himself made the Canon of the Old Testament clear. The canon of Scripture refers to the final collection . In the Protestant Bible. They understood that the Scriptures themselves were not the sole infallible source of authority for Christian faith and practice, otherwise they would not have felt the need to provide notes to help with interpretation. Well, Martin Luther didnt like 7 books of the Old Testament that disagreed with his personal view of theology, so he threw them out of his bible in the 16th Century. As therefore, the Church reads the books of Judith and Tobias and of the Maccbbees, but does not receive them in the canonical scriptures, so also she may read these writings two writings for the edification of the people, not to establish the authority of ecclesiastical doctrines.. Its worth noting that according to verse 6, its an angel talking. The authors of four Biblical books three of which were prophets attended the council that decided once and for all the Hebrew Bible (Tanach). Acts 2:10 Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome, it is speaking of this entire region of Egypt and Libya, northern Egypt no longer being considered Egypt but Rome. He is the King of Israel; let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. Catholic Bible has 66 books of the Protestant Old and New Testament plus 7 more books, a total of 73 books in all. I do have a question though: In this article, you use the terms dueterocanonical and Septuagint pretty interchangebly, but earlier on, you referred to the specific 7 books as the dueterocanon/apocrypha; forgive me if the answer if repetetive as it is my first time even hearing of these terms, but does that mean that the apocrypha/dueterocanons actually refer to all the apocryphal books (including the ones that were definitely rejected from the Catholic church)? Are we really going to believe that for 1200 years the true Christian Church was not there? (Fortunately, there has never been any disagreement about the New Testament.). A deuterocanon is a term used by some scholars and by Catholics to denote the books (and parts of books) of the Old Testament that are in the Greek Septuagint collection but are not in the Hebrew Bible.A Catholic Bible is a Christian Bible that includes the entire 73-book canon recognized by the Catholic Church.A deuterocanon is a term used by some scholars and by Catholics to denote the books (and parts of books) of the Old Testament that are in the. Now, iota could refer to the Greek language, but Keraia certainly does not. There are some Protestants who use Bibles that have a section known as the Apocrypha that contains 14 more books.These writings are not considered to be part of the canon of Scripture, but they do increase the overall number of books in the Bible up to 80.This is typically contrasted with the 73 books of the Catholic Bible, which is considered to be part of the Old Testament and contains seven deuterocanonical books. Gary Michuta gives an updated and extended version of the authoritative work he has done on this significant topic in his book titled Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger. As weve already seen, the Council of Florence was the first time the Canon of Scripture was officially listed in an ecumenical council. The Catholic world is now experiencing a kind of catharsis, when passions have subsided, and everything that was written earlier began to be perceived in the light of recent events. Does doing something for centuries make it right? These books are called the deuterocanon, or second canon, by Catholics, and the apocrypha, or hidden/obscure, by Protestants (Christians who protest against the Catholic Church). I have seen no proof of this yet, otherwise I would be Catholic. 6059. The bible consists of 73 books in the old testament and 27 books belonging to the new testament. Further, if you understand how highly the Jewish people revered the scriptures, youd see that them using a Greek translation is HIGHLY unlikely. They could not have been written after the time of Ezra (around 400 BC); 4. That changed with the New covenant, allowing more to be added. Questions may be sent to Father Kenneth Doyle . No, and Heres Proof. In 382 AD the Church had the Council and determined that the canon was 73 books. Discussion : The most noticeable differences occur in the number of books included and the order in which they have been arranged. This list was finally approved by Pope Damasus I in 382 AD, and was formally approved by the Church Council of Rome in that same year. @Yaakov. It it possible (and I think likely) the Deuterocanon was considered scripture by the majority of the Catholic Church earlier. In total, these constitute seven volumes. It looks to me like its saying the birth of a daughter is equivalent to having an undisciplined son, still denigrating the daughters birth. It was given a Nihil Obstat by a Doctor of Sacred Theology, and an Imprimatur by an Archbishop. Alexandria was created by Alexander the Great in his names sake to be the capital of his empire, the Ptolemaic kingdom. We need to look at the words. Further as weve already seen the Jews never considered the deuterocanonical books scripture. Nearly all of the Deuterocanonical books were written during the 400 silent years. God Himself weighed in on the OT canon through a few OT prophets. I would assume for those who indeed memorized the Torah. He said to answer the assumptions rather than the statement itself. They used 4 criteria for deciding whether or not certain books were canonical . (John E. Steinmueller, A Companion to Scripture Studies, vol.1, p.80), Hrabanus (9th century A.D.) said the Old Testament was formed by Ezra into twenty-two books that there might be as many books in the Law as there are letters. (Whitaker, Disputation), Peter of Cluny (Better know as Peter the Venerable and also know as Blessed Peter of Montboissier) (1150 A.D.): Twenty-two books. By comparison, the books of the Catholic Bible include all 66 in the previous list plus seven extra books. It was likely written around 430 BC according to the Bible timeline on BibleHub.com. Besides, the Deuterocanon were considered good books and worthy of reading just not scripture. Cyril of Jerusalem, and I quoted him saying as such nearer the end of the article. I wish you would correct the misuse of its in place of its. Since were talking about the details of words and their meanings here, it seems important to get the small details right, or they call the big details into question. The Jews didnt consider anything written after Malachi inspired because there were no prophets at that time. I would also like to point out this this quote is from a POPE from the 7th Century. That lends a LOT of weight to their opinion of the deuterocanonical books. No disagreement.. no saddening God. Maybe now, we can spend our time more wisely, maybe by picking up a new skill, like writing or practicing art, instead of wasting it arguing about things that dont matter. There is another division which existed in Jesus day and for many centuries afterward. A: The Protestant translation of the Old Testament is missing seven books that are included in the Catholic Bible: Baruch, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach, Tobit, and Wisdom. The Jews traditionally never accepted them as scripture (which Ill prove in a bit). Their names are as follows: The five books of MosesGenesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. Jesus words were most likely Aramaic yes? Did the Holy Spirit make an error with the 73 book canon? Look for any Bible Translation with CE (for Catholic Edition) after the title. If you believe that the posting of any material infringes your copyright, be sure to contact us through the contact form and your material will be removed! I for one would like to review the facts in there original context to verify that claim. I read it carefully so I know the contents pretty well. The following is a quote from a letter that Jerome wrote to Paula and Eustochium in 394 AD. There are 66 books in the bible. Its been a while since I did the research so I might not be remembering, but I dont remember seeing conclusive proof of that. Further, remember that in the Old Testament, the Israelites actually lost the Torah Gods law so completely that no one had heard it when it was read to king Josiah. That is different from dwelling so I question the line of reasoning that Jewish men visited Egypt ergo the Septuigint is false. 15 then hear the word of the Lord, O remnant of Judah. Then 3 squared equals 9, so there are 39 books in the old Testament. Protestant Bibles have only 39 books in the Old Testament, however, while Catholic Bibles have 46. I proofread slowly out loud several times before publishing and still miss things, though Im always working to improve. (this list includes Baruch, but none of the other deuterocanonical books). There are 80 books in the King James Bible; 39 in the Old Testament, 14 in the Apocrypha, and 27 in the New Testament. He trusts in God; let God deliver him now, if he desires him; for he said, `I am the Son of God.. The first new Catholic Bible to [], Who was the leader of the catholic church, What is the catholic position on divorce and remarriage. The Old Testament documents everything from the creation of life up until the birth of Jesus. Okay, well look at your one church idea first. Catholics have forty-six (46) books in the Old Testament, while Protestants have only thirty-nine (39). In arguing with the Sadducees about the resurrection, Jesus did not admonish them for not accepting the Books of the Prophets, where the resurrection was clearly referenced, (eg Daniel 12:1-2 & Isaiah 26:19). Do please send me an email from the contact page and we can discuss it further. The Septuagint is a translation of the Hebrew Bible (Our Old Testament) into Greek. They are Tobit, Judith, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus and Baruch. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); The Bible: 66 books vs 73 and Why (the Apocrypha Explained). I am not being rude or belligerent but I really would like someone to explain calmly and in simple language because I am slow Please tell me how that is not absurd to say the Church got the 73 book Canon wrong based on Jesus promise to be with the Church to the end of the age and to send the Spirit of Truth to guide the church in All TRUTH. Sirach teaches quite plainly that sin entered the world through a woman (Eve). Content. Some Protestants believe that the Catholic Church added 7 books to the Bible at the Council of Trent in response to Luther's Reformation, but that couldn't be further from the . Josephus makes the same argument I made earlier in the article. One of the comments in this article is not totally true. 9 For almsgiving delivers from death, and it will purge away every sin. Notice the books below in red? We are less sure how Jews in Alexandria were schooled, but we do know how Jews in Israel during Jesus day were schooled. The Jews in Jesus day had three levels of education, which was most likely instituted by Ezra after the exile in order to teach the people the Scriptures again. Interesting that Saint Cyril said the Apostles and bishops of old time didnt accept the deuterocanonical books. Gosh, maybe it is best to follow the 10 Commandments and we will all make God happy . Eve was indeed the first to sin, but this verse goes farther to say that because of Eves sin we all die because we caught sin through her. In that day Israel will be the third, along with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing on the earth. What is the sin that God will not forgive? Bible means "book," and it is a collection of books from different lands, authors, languages and historical periods, a text by which to pass on our faith. Port Elizabeth Why did you omit this? The following items may be found in this section: 1 Esdras (Vulgate 3 Esdras), Judith (which is spelled Judeth in Geneva), The remainder of Esther (Esther 10:416:24 in the Vulgate), Ecclesiasticus, which is often referred to as Sirach, Baruch and the Epistle of Jeremy (known as Jeremiah in Geneva) (both of which are included in the Vulgate version of Baruch). At this time, some controversy still existed over what are called the seven "deuterocanonical books" Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and I & II Maccabees although they had been incorporated in their entirety or at least partially in versions of the Septuagint, the official Greek translation of the Old Testament (c. 100 BC). Catholics believe that the Protestant Reformers deleted certain works, which had been deemed part of Sacred Scripture for a long time, because they disapproved of what was written in those writings. It might be like a book written by C.S. Thats not surprising because the first time the Old Testament canon was officially recorded was the Council of Florence in 15th century. Following these there is Joshua, the son of Nun, then Judges, then Ruth. The Bible is often thought of as one book. I cannot for the life of me believe that the church which is described as the pillar and bulwark of truth was not even on the earth from 382 To 1520. These 7 books were accepted by the Diaspora Jews (the Alexandrian Canon) who were not in Palestine. How many books are in the Holy Bible? However, once here they typically need English to speak to Americans, even though they use still use Spanish among themselves. Simply backing up two verses will provide enough context to disprove of your point. Did you know that the bible was made up of around 80 books when the bible was first translated from Latin to English by the Vatican in 1611? DONATE; Home; Apologetics. Catholic Bibles also include sections in the Books of Esther and Daniel. We know from the Mishnah (the written record of oral tradition at Jesus time and afterward) among other places that Jewish children were schooled this way. But a shameful daughter might not be able to obtain a high bride-price, and maybe not even obtain a husband at all; unless her father pays a man to take her, and hence the birth of an (eventually) undisciplined/shameful daughter is a loss. Then take 3 x 9 = 27, the number of books in the New Testament. Catholicism is one of the most widespread religious trends in Christianity. However, theres good reason to believe they arent infallible. Saint Cyril of Jerusalem (313 386 AD) stressed (in Catechetical Lecture 4.35) that ONLY the 22 books of the Old Testament should be read, and that Christians should have nothing to do with the apocryphal writings. The New Testament You need only remember the number 3. Sir. I did some looking this morning based on what you suggested and found some interesting things. What books are different in the Catholic Bible? The Jews especially the Pharisees took this care because the scriptures mattered. It also recounts some history of the text, and about the various versions that existed. Further, many of the early church fathers didnt accept them (including a Pope in the 7th century). Being therefore a child of the Church, trench thou not upon its statutes. 4) He said that He was going to send the Spirit of Truth to guide the Church in all truth. However, 14 books were voted for removal in 1684. Ptolemys revolt led to a new subdivision of the empire with the Partition of Triparadisus in 320 BC. Further, we know they were schooled in Hebrew. How can a book be inspired by God, when the book itself claims that the Holy Spirit didnt inspire anyone during the time it was written? The words Jot and tittle are archaic, but its the meaning in the Greek thats important. Im not sure I agree, but I can see where youre coming from. Jewish children where schooled in Hebrew and studied the Hebrew scriptures. When did Catholics add extra books to the Bible? Lewis, or any other popular Christian author. On the other hand, there are many references indeed from the deuterocanonicals in the New Testament. Can that make any sense? Heres but one quick article I found demonstrating profound and irreconcilable historical errors in the Quran. Then Paul says 5) the pillar and bulwark of truth is the church. Okay so let us look in church history at the Canon. Wikipedia has a whole article about Non-Cannon books referenced by the Bible. 23 Of course they would also be able to speak Greek because it was the trade language of the world in Jesus day. At the ages of six through twelve, the Jewish boys and girls would begin their education in the synagogue school, learning how to read and write. Thats a reasonable argument if you believe Christ used the Septuagint. The Gutenberg Bible was printed in 1454 and it included the deuterocanonical Books. The most common dates mentioned are between 150 BC and 130 BC. The Babylonian Talmud Baba Bathra 21a:6 says, Before the age of six do not accept pupils; from that age you can accept them, and stuff them with Torah like an ox. Incredible, isnt it! Matthew. Why would Jesus use the Septuagint (Greek) when his audience had already memorized large portions of the Hebrew scriptures? Not a single one. Did Jesus lie? The Septuagint was not translated until the 2nd and 1st century BC in alexandria. Seleucus, who had been Commander-in-Chief of the Companion cavalry (hetairoi) and appointed first or court chiliarch (which made him the senior officer in the Royal Army after the regent and commander-in-chief Perdiccas since 323 BC, though he helped to assassinate him later) received Babylonia and, from that point, continued to expand his dominions ruthlessly. 30 Water extinguishes a blazing fire: so almsgiving atones for sin. Maccabees testifies to this fact, and its an accepted part of Bible history. When they cry out to the LORD because of their oppressors, he will send them a savior and defender, and he will rescue them. Alexandria during the time of translation of the Septuagint was a kingdom of Greece and Alexandria itself was not established until after Alexander the Great conquered that part of Egypt which was then under Persian control for the previous 200 years. This version of the bible includes both the Old and New Testaments. Did you know that the bible was made up of around 80 books when the bible was first translated from Latin to English by the Vatican in 1611? What differs between Catholic Bibles and Protestant Bibles is the Old Testament. While its great that all of a sudden so many non-Catholics start quoting the early Church Fathers, its not right to quote them on this and then not on the Eucharist, the papacy, or the supremacy of Rome, all which prove that the Catholic Church was the only Church around in those days. The Septuagint includes the disputed 7 books that Protestants do not recognize as scriptural. Anyone who believes in a sacred text should have good reason to trust it. St Jerome compiled the document (with Pope St Damasus I) that set the Deuterocanon up. There is therefore really no such thing as Sola Scriptura since we all rely on some form of tradition. In 2 Maccabees 2:4-7, we learn the final resting place of the Ark of the Covenant and when it will be found (Sorry Indiana Jones!). Was he guided by the Holy Spirit, guided by God, in going along with the very Jews who were NOT CONVERTS to Christ, who did not want to spread the gospel of Jesus? This "original" Bible contained 80 books, including the Apocrypha, which means hidden. So the real church with the correct Bible was not on earth if the Protestant claim is true. Now, some sects of Jews might have later rejected what God spoke through His prophets, but that doesnt change the fundamental authority of Thus says the Lord just because some people reject what hes said. Anshei Knesset HaGedolah Men of the Great Assembly; founded by Ezra in approximately 520 B.C.E., this institution of Torah Sages led the Jewish People at the beginning of the Second Temple Era (ca. It is very eaasy to take one passage of scripture, or even several and prove something. 46 He got under the elephant, stabbed it from beneath, and killed it; but it fell to the ground upon him and there he died. In the Christian church, a [], The Latin Vulgate Bible is the only version of the Bible that a Catholic is expected to correctly utilize. This indicates that the Jewish Canon was in no way settled in the Judaism of Jesuss time. So what happened? Catholics say the Church put the Bible together.