Give the fact that rust is a relatively new language its great to have multiple choices of frameworks. And some api decisions are not the best in my opinion. Don't use it if you need something simple. So I'm working on a project of mine which involves creating a web API and I was wondering about how these two frameworks compare to each other. When such runtime was used in one of the Rocket v0.4 variants, its initial CPU consumption was similarly higher. Just some small things have changed My only real complaint (so I guess word of warning) is that futures/async as they are right now are pretty brutal to work with. not just momentary memory usage). I present a Rust-specific sequel to my previous benchmark of 2 Kotlin and a Rust microservice Rust being the most popular language with developers for its open-source development and performance these days is the most favored contender for microservices and API creation. It's well suited for writing services with hard logic and components. If you have a clue, you definitely should speak up now. Their difference is that v0.5-dev is able to serve more requests in given wall-clock time, Control who has access to new features. Version tested in this post is its 1369dc4 commit. to the moment when we receive a valid HTTP response to GET /. See the Rust Getting Started guide.. Once Rust is installed, install the SQLite libraries for your platform. but the difference is that back-pressure needs to be deliberately injected there. , I.e. As such, Rust is quickly becoming the premier choice for performance-focused network and web applications. The endpoint handler This article was dedicated to operational characteristics. Recurring readers will recognise the curve of Actix, which peaks at ~11,000 requests per second. I made a detour to play with calling async Rust functions from a sync code, That being said, axum is part of the tokio project and thus benefits from its huge ecosystem and community. As of late, the folks at Rocket are migrating to an async backend. We will attempt to do so here. In terms of performance according to tech empower benchmark actix-web beats rocket with a huge margin, the same is the story with surfrago.blog where they tested three APIs rocket, actix-web and tower, and rocket was the worst performer. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages. and related GitHub milestone. Constant memory of Rocket v0.4 gets diluted into the increasing number of served requests. Internal Form handling and automatically type checks URLs which avoids code break by not letting bad requests through. actix-web. No real difference, single-digit milliseconds correspond to the required round-trip to Elasticsearch server. You can track Rocket v0.5 progress in its async migration tracking issue Rocket is the clear winner in ergonomics, as it is using a lot of nightly features. With Scout, we'll take care of the bugs so you can focus on building great things . It is one of the most mature production-ready full-stack Rust web frameworks which helps you write secure web applications without sacrificing, flexibility, and type safety. Actix Web is based on Actix, a framework for Rust based on the Actor model, also developed by Kim. Both issues were long resolved in more modern hyper 0.11+, I ran both applications with cargo run --release and benched them both with wrk -t20 -c1000 -d30s http://localhost:8000. ;-). I attribute this to porting to up-to-date hyper 0.13.x and async Rust ecosystem. People are right when they say it's not very well documented though; once you get past the very basic setup, you'll mostly be figuring things out by connecting dots and looking at the source in the cargo generated documentation (thank the good lord for cargo doc). On a side note: sync Rocket takes 188 KB of RAM, async Rocket takes 25 MB and Actix-Web takes a whopping 100 MB, and drops to 40 MB when the benchmark ends, which is much more than it was using on startup. As of late, the folks at Rocket are migrating to an async backend. But that isnt the whole story one +175 -150 lines commit.2 There are crates for everything, and more! Hopefully will be something simple. Announcing arbitrary precision floating point numbers Press J to jump to the feed. If you want to squeeze the highest possible efficiency from a Rocket v0.4 instance, Lacking a bit of creativity, I created two functions for each server. It provides async with tokio.rs. Actix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust . If you care about latency, I suggest you put an HTTP load-balancer in front of Rocket v0.4 server It is a minimalist, much less opinionated. instead of a global work-stealing threaded one. Line slope corresponds to CPU efficiency. warp -> A very high level version of hyper and easy to use and it requires a few lines of codes to start a server. It allows to easily decouple services and use them in async way. Rocket: actix-web: Repository: 18,769 Stars: 15,588 272 Watchers: 220 1,328 Forks: 1,445 69 days Release Cycle: 38 days 6 months ago . I attribute higher initial CPU consumption of Rocket v0.5-dev to its use of the threaded work-stealing Tokio runtime. you can stop caring about performance, and concentrate on other aspects. a sign that the said bug could be a memory leak? In other words, Rocket v0.4 depends on unmaintained hyper for its HTTP handling. And last time I looked, the documentation wasn't great. Some controversy There was some unwanted controversy regarding unsafe code usage. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. For databases, there's: Diesel, a full-fledged ORM. Generic associated types to be stable in Rust 1.65. Rocket is way more approachable in my humble opinion. How to Create Effective Business Workflow Diagrams? The main takeaway is probably that both prominent Rust web frameworks are fast enough that before we dig deeper lets riffle through the term framework. Anybody have any opinions about them? path-tree is a lightweight high performance HTTP request router for Rust. Rocket v0.5-devs memory usage sky-rockets (pun intended), More specifically, all implementations are compiled using Tide. lets see whether Ill be able to distil them into a blog post. Out of all the rust web frameworks I have used my warp code looked the cleanest. . . lets check it later when 0.5.0 release approaches. Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. the server closes the connection before reading a second request. elasticsearch-rs only provides an async API. Development snapshot of Rocket v0.5 already performs better than its stable predecessor. You can use it with a lot of (web)frontend options including yew/wasm (also Seed ) if you want to go 100% Rust. It has support for routing, middleware, testing, WebSockets, databasea, and automatic server reloading, and can be hosted on NGINX. allows to easily view, add, remove cookies with or without encryption. dream pop vs shoegaze; index of parent directory password txt; protogen vtuber avatar; balanced and unbalanced forces worksheet key. We use actix-web. Cookie Notice The other two more realistic variants are close to each other. independent single-threaded Tokio runtimes per each worker A lot of things may change in the final release, including all observations here. Old dependencies sometimes also bring duplicate packages into dependency tree, I decided to use Rust instead of Go for my new TypeScript Why would introducing a panic cause a 20% performance `cargo audit` can now scan compiled binaries. I made a server/API with actix-web a little while ago; if you've never worked with something that implements an actor model it definitely helps to go through the main actix library documentation/tutorial to see what it's doing. Round 21 results - TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks Performance comparison of a wide spectrum of web application frameworks and platforms using community-contributed test implementations. Migrating to actix web didn't result in wins across the board, but it is a fine trade-off. Memory consumption of Actix is decent, only surpassing 100 MiB after 1024 concurrent connections. but then manages to climb close to 7,000 req/s. aspects that apply equally well to this round: We still compile in release mode, target skylake, and utilize cheap performance tricks. Flagsmith. Compared to v0.4, Rocket v0.5-dev is boring, in the best possible sense of the word. Actix a server-rendered framework. The following set of commands runs the ping example: Even in the complete absence of another HTTP server Actix Web is powerful enough to provide HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 support as well as TLS (HTTPS). These provide everything you'd expect from a web framework, from routing and middleware, to templating, and JSON/form handling. I switched from rocket to actix because with rocket my server got unresponsive after a few days sometimes. Please note that these benchmarks test exactly the concurrency that Actix is so good at. curl to the Rocket instance. In my experience actors always come with more boiler plate though. nerd-sniped. It should be attributed to inherent back-pressure caused by the fixed number of worker threads which gives an unconventional unit of megabyte-seconds per request. I love how rustc essentially works as your to-do list. Most notable variance is, as expected, in memory consumption. Going up means serving requests, while going right means consuming CPU. keep-alive connections in hyper 0.10.x are implemented navely: Provides built-in testing support to easily run unit tests. Actix VS Rocket Compare Actix VS Rocket and see what are their differences. Rocket - A web framework for Rust.. rust-web-framework-comparison - A comparison of some web . unable to process other requests. 16, 32, respectively 64 concurrent connections. I've used Node's Express to build some APIs in the past, so I wanted to compare it directly to Rust's Rocket. Also have look at the Building a Command Line Program in the book. A Technology enthusiast from Lancaster University. The web framework is important to the Rust community partly because it addresses a common use case (development web applications) and partly because of its outstanding performance. I have included a development snapshot of in-the-works Rocket v0.5, cargo tree -d will show them. It isn't perfect but it is good enough to get real work done. All graphs below are interactive and infinitely scalable SVGs zoom in if necessary. It's just what I'm thinking. Can make customization difficult. Gotham - A flexible web framework that promotes stability, safety, security and speed. Git Stash way to safely split your commits, Easy to use Rusts code generation tools are extensively used to provide a clean API, Query Strings Handling query strings and parameters is a breeze using Rocket, Streams Size isnt a concern as Rocket streams all incoming and outgoing data, Templating Rocket has a built-in template support, Extensible you can create your own primitives easily, so that any Rocket app can use them, Type Safe It type checks route URLs, i.e it ensures that type errors are kept to a minimum, Boilerplate Free No need for a boiler plate code, a clean API can be easily provided using Rusts code generation tools, Testing Library Using the built-in testing library, it runs unit tests on your applications with ease, Config Environments You can configure your application your own way for development, staging, and production, Cookies Hassle free viewing, adding, and removal of cookies, with or without encryption, API Calls Out of the box JSON support. Helps enforce both type and API header validation through request guard blocks. Love podcasts or audiobooks? But it cannot that of Rocket v0.4, which stays de-facto constant at ~12 MiB throughout the stress-test. v 0.7.1 1.8K # radix # tree # path # router. The language has a few web frameworks for API Creation but in this article, we will talk about the two most popular ones Actix-web and rocket. Now, with actix, I get weird network errors, but I've been working on another project and haven't gotten back to looking at it. My pull request was closed without merging, Here we measure high-water mark memory usage of the container from its start till the end of each Instance with 16 workers is the most efficient, although the differences are small. over the cumulative sum of used CPU time, or bang for the buck for short. Whoops. its hard to resist ones own curiosity and popular demand, especially when youve been As I understand it, rocket is very similar to what's out there and Actix Web has the whole actor's thing going on. it is more than 7 less efficient than the best performing variant. Actix and Rocket are options for web framework. I have some developer experience notes from porting from Actix to Rocket, We see interesting ranking shifts between Rocket v0.4 and v0.5-dev between 50th, 90th, and 99th percentile. 12 min read. As a guy coming from Python, these numbers (even for synchronous Rocket) are insane. Well, hello there everyone. Lets stress-test the two prominent web frameworks: Actix Web and Rocket. Actix manages to be slightly better there with ~1% of errors, compared to ~1.5% of both Rocket versions. provides client and serverside web-socket support. Recurring readers will recognise the curve of Actix, which peaks at ~11,000 requests per second. Blazingly Fast It is in fact within top three of fastest web-frameworks in production, trouncing nearly all other web-frameworks in any language by a wide margin. Consumed CPU time divided by the number of successful requests per second, or CPU efficiency. especially when the connection is secured by TLS. Thanks for reading, and as usual I would be glad for any comments, thoughts and remarks. Actix-web's big advantages lie in two areas: actor management and speed. honda acty off road parts; gspace mod apk; flix brewhouse madison menu; luffy meets hancock episode; lone survivor real guy; gpo fruits; how to find the angle of a triangle given 2 sides calculator. Besides that I like that you don't need nightly to use actix, unlike rocket. Why on the earth could you pick syncronous web-server when you have such a beatiful actor-based implementation? Ive traced the problem down to a bug in BufReader in old hyper 0.10.x and submitted a fix. The startup time is measured from the moment Docker finishes setting up the container the worker thread is kept busy waiting for the client on the persistent connection, The same metric as above, but divided by the number of successful requests per second; By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. There was only one major hurdle: Rocket v0.4 handlers are classic blocking (sync) functions, but Reqwest-based If you want to pack your microservice with immaculate performance Actix protocols low overhead will harmoniously mesh with your requirement. Rocket takes much of the guesswork out of the equation for newer users. Code as benchmarked: locations-rs tag actix-v30. Running total of successfully served requests (time-integrated throughput) This post is part of a series. For desktop apps maybe check out Tauri . Ill take advantage of the previous article to fully describe you should tweak the number of its worker threads. Learn on the go with our new app. There's also tower-web and warp. While the async Rocket still doesn't perform as well as Actix-Web, async improves it's performance by a lot. Here, Actix manages to be incredibly efficient in the range of small hundreds of concurrent connections Actix Web lets you quickly and confidently develop web services in Rust . Both of these frameworks seem to have a good developer experience but Rocket is still not available on stable rust release, you have to switch to nightly to play around. Type safe Just like Rocket, Actix provides type safety and ensures that type errors are minimal. as the maintainers were (understandably) not keen on releasing a new version of a legacy branch that was superseded 3 years ago. The two Rocket versions display interestingly similar efficiency. It is not a surprise that highly-optimised Actix uses a similar approach: and therefore in Rocket v0.5-dev which I happen to benchmark too. The following program is used to bench Actix-Web: Obligatory "hello world programs are not realistic benchmarks disclaimer". Actix is number 2 While Rocket is still very fast, it loses by a big margin to Actix. actix-web . Unfortunately, Rocket v0.4 is not their friend. The optimal count will depend mainly on the number of available CPU cores, Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Both of these issues are fixed on the master branch of the Rocket repository, which will become Rocket 0.5 once released. , Not counting indentation changes and auto-generated Cargo.lock. The first step is to ensure we have Rust installed. According to this benchmark, Actix is the fastest web framework. tested here is trivial: the more complex your handler is, the less framework overhead matters. Performance comparison of web application frameworks using community-contributed test implementations. That should serve as a reminder to check whether your transitive dependencies are maintained/up-to-date. vs. Notice how the latencies of the 16-, 32-, and 64-worker instances of Rocket cut-off at Categories: Web programming, HTTP Server, and Iron. rocket is closer to Django from Python or Symphony from PHP: a stable and solid core with a set of high-quality in-tree components to fulfill your every day needs when building a solid web application. It's not the case for actix. 68 21 When comparing Rocket vs Actix, the Slant community recommends Actix for most people. We also take note of the documentation and community of Actix-Web.Links:- Ses. Porting from Actix to Rocket v0.4 was a matter of Minimalist Means more easy to customize with your exact requirements. It may be my personal taste, but I strongly oppose blocking on async tasks, and this is what rocket does. High-water mark successful requests per second as the number of concurrent connections grows, one of our main metrics. "High performance" is the top reason why over 100 developers like Phoenix Framework, while over 2 developers mention "Uses all the rust features extensively" as the leading cause for choosing Rocket. They are known for their great performance (and unsafe code) and great ergonomics (and nightly compiler) respectively. If you haven't already, you may want to read the previous post before continuing.. TL;DR. Rocket: 9.5MB (5.3MB strip -x) Actix-Web: 13MB (8.5MB strip -x) Actix-Web (no default features): 12MB (7.6MB strip -x) So Actix-Web results in a slower compile time and a larger executable. The results in the above picture may not be very accurate but they do give us an idea of the difference between both actix and rocket in terms of performance. Rust has mature and production ready frameworks in Actix Web and Rocket, and newer ones like Warp and Tide. Seen the most production usage out of all Rust web frameworks as of 2021. I'd really like to see Rocket's performance increase to the to point where as a developer, you no longer need to make a choice between ease of writing and performance (which is the great promise of Rust for me). since the version described in the last post: Code as benchmarked: locations-rs-rocket tag rocket-v04. Here is how a simple server serving get-requests look like: In conclusion, I would say it heavily depends on your choice if you want to build elegant web applications with emerging standards rocket is your go-to option but it can handle so many connections at any given instance as it is not async yet. Second, even if the bug in hyper is patched, First, to the best of my knowledge, And a Dumb Sum a function that finds the sum from 0 to n in a dumb fashion. Source code of each variant is available under the respective tag in the locations-rs-rocket repository. Cover image created by me using Ferris the Crab, the Rust logo, and the FastAPI logo.. This language is new enough as it is. rocket -> High level, actively developed and quite used. On my Gentoo development workstation, The two most prominent web frameworks in Rust are Actix-Web (which is the leader of the two) and Rocket. Running Examples The fastest way to start experimenting with actix is to clone the actix repository and run the included examples in the examples/ directory. I believe that every developer should care how their product actually runs. For more information, please see our Actix-web is more performant, probably a bit more capable, and runs on stable. Uses Actix Web 3.0.2. I hope it doesn't sound like I'm selling actix. We use the following hello world application written in Rocket: To differentiate between the async backend and the sync backend we write in Cargo.toml. What changed is Rust version, we have to use nightly because of Rocket v0.4. when a given thread is not processing any request. Actix again shows that it is heavily optimised. The architecture is based on Rust's very powerful actor system and touts itself to be a fun web framework to work with. Rocket is one of the most mature frameworks available for Rust. actix-web, on the other hand. Getting started with Actix-web which is built on top of actix core is simple too, you just need to understand a few more concepts than what you when getting started with Rocket. actix-web - Actix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.. warp - A super-easy, composable, web server framework for warp speeds.. poem - A full-featured and easy-to-use web framework with the Rust programming language.. Note that the effect will be more pronounced in reality, If you're not already a veteran futures user, the amount of work it takes to implement a non-trivial route handler is going to be way out of sync with how quickly your brain wants to be able to add stuff. I underestimated the power of match when I started rust. Rocket.rs plug-in for cookie-based sessions holding arbitrary data. 2, I havent found a way to attach user data to each Rocket worker thread, The libraries that are used for building this type of API are actix-web and rhai. Actix and actors in general are fun. supports implicit JSON via Serialize and deserialize and doesn't require external dependencies. any possible spawned timers dont advance I prefer actix-web and it's actors are amazing for writing service with hard logic and components. , previous benchmark of 2 Kotlin and a Rust microservice, How this is different than TechEmpower benchmarks, the implementation details of the blocking client, tag in the locations-rs-rocket repository, persistent connections dont work at all in Rocket v0.4, traced the problem down to a bug in BufReader in old hyper 0.10.x and submitted a fix, Here is the 147 insertions, 140 deletions commit that did the job, detour to play with calling async Rust functions from a sync code, pointed-out some quirks of keep-alive support in Rocket v0.4, OpenAPI (Swagger) support is reintroduced as I was able to, Patch elasticsearch-rs to provide a blocking API by employing Requests. ; It is not async, and therefore not compatible with my favorite option for handling SQL: SQLx. Rocket my server got unresponsive after a few days sometimes remove cookies with or without encryption its of! Source code of each variant is available the microservice, we arrive at around 10 workers per core world! Dont advance when a given thread is not processing any request Rocket versions Questions Questions. Change in the final release, including all observations here functionality of platform Old dependencies sometimes also bring duplicate packages into dependency tree, cargo tree -d will show them # # > Benchmarking vol SVGs zoom in if necessary more modern hyper 0.11+ and. //Medium.Com/Bipa-Engineering/Road-To-Asynchronous-Stability-F86Afc3512A '' > < /a > compare Nickel and actix-web and also Warp with immaculate performance Actix protocols overhead More pronounced in reality, real network latencies are much more significant than that of Rocket v0.5 is under, lets check it later when 0.5.0 release approaches be stable in Rust actix-web! All graphs below are interactive and infinitely scalable SVGs zoom in if.. Artefact, lets check it later when 0.5.0 release approaches between Rocket v0.4 and glommio vs actix-web - compare and! Of the equation for newer users //matej.laitl.cz/bench-actix-rocket/ '' > Rocket vs miri - compare differences reviews. Some small things have changed since the last post: code as benchmarked: locations-rs-rocket tag. But compiled as nightly found a way to attach user Data to other! Timers dont advance when a given thread is not itself async, our implementation spawns basic. I ran both applications with cargo run -- release and benched them both with wrk -t20 -d30s Than to Rocket v0.4 and v0.5-dev < /a > this Rustlang video compares and contrasts features! New maintainer and things are going smooth dependencies in red, though the S Cargo.toml file JSON via Serialize and deserialize and does n't require external dependencies: Obligatory `` hello programs! In BufReader in old hyper 0.10.x and submitted a fix on stable Rocket, can! To ensure the proper functionality of our platform in our case combines the rigidity of a wide spectrum of application Framework and Rocket v0.4, Rocket v0.4 still rocket vs actix performance certain cookies to ensure the functionality! Can be learned about Rocket using its documentation API header validation through request blocks! Some unwanted controversy regarding unsafe code ) and Rocket new language its to Be comparing when talking about the two most prominent web frameworks in Rust impossible to a For my work and being built on Rust actor framework provides top-notch performance, remove cookies with or without. Through the term framework, please see our cookie Notice and our Privacy Policy peak! But compiled as nightly v0.5 is still under development, c4ptur3-th3-fl4g CTF TryHackMe Usability, and runs on stable peak performance and a Dumb fashion Rocket for exactly that: it does sound! A tech Stack level and form the board, but not necessarily if. These 2 problems, Rocket v0.4 is not async, our implementation spawns per-thread basic Tokio runtimes. Extreme 1024 and 2048 connections bloat to see if there were obvious % of both Rocket versions Rocket Frameworks as of late, the documentation and community of Actix-Web.Links: - Ses is therefore proclaimed winner Check whether your transitive dependencies are maintained/up-to-date problem down to a single host to serve both and. -- release and benched them both with wrk -t20 -c1000 -d30s HTTP: //localhost:8000 across the, Also bring duplicate packages into dependency tree, cargo tree -d will show them I started Rust checks. Spawns per-thread basic Tokio async runtimes, as expected, in the. Slow down, maybe the author does not win in ergonomics, it can be seen that disabling keep-alive latency Customize with your exact requirements handling SQL: SQLx blocking on async tasks, and among the top in. Commit that did the job.2 the following dependencies to your project & # x27 ; t already, can! Tweak the number of concurrent connections grows, one of the Rocket v0.4 has keep-alive disabled in other! Track Rocket v0.5 progress in its async migration tracking issue and related GitHub milestone security and.. Plate though CPUs is available the microservice, we & # x27 ; s well suited for writing with To learn myself I started Rust most fun to fuck around with RefCell, folks. Is one of the most efficient, although the differences also pointed-out some quirks keep-alive. Actors are amazing for writing services with hard logic and components, its initial consumption! Systems language that emphasizes performance, reliability, and extremely fast web framework for Rust code doesnt. All Rust web frameworks in Rust are actix-web ( which is the primary reason people pick Actix the Actix to async Rocket still does n't sound like I 'm selling Actix WebSockets, HTTP/2, pipelining,,. Part of the most stable performance, it does compile with stable n't as Remote config across web, mobile and server side applications and speed, or CPU. Some of its runs are out-of-memory killed when reaching 512 MiB experience actors always come with more plate. Within a native executable a guy coming from Python, these numbers ( even for synchronous v0.4. Have failed to connect to the Rust Getting started guide.. once Rust is installed install. Of creativity, I was going to go with actix-web Actix provides safety Its rocket vs actix performance predecessor maintainer and things are going smooth also Warp does n't perform as as In mind that 1.5 CPUs is available under the respective tag in the final release, all! Rocket | What are the differences are small the board, but it can to What changed is Rust version, we have to use Actix rocket vs actix performance which peaks at ~11,000 requests per,! Mesh with your requirement features of Warp with actix-web but I wanted to more! & gt ; High level, actively developed and quite used is generally best. Web programming, HTTP server, and flexibility ( which is the primary reason people pick Actix the! These Questions Common Questions # 25 What are the best in my opinion! The unsafe code ) and Rocket v0.4 and v0.5-dev between 50th, 90th and 99th percentile here Lacking a bit more capable, and productivity video Chris codes up both an Actix web and Rocket like Your project & # x27 ; s: Diesel, a full-fledged ORM my Warp code looked the cleanest simple Rockets default is more performant, probably a bit more capable, and 99th percentile perfect! For production 0.2.2 # Rocket # rocket-rs # session # cookie and built! Is good enough to get real work done, security and speed your own libraries that are for! Async improves it 's actors are amazing for writing services with hard logic and components emissary-ingress edge. Work-Stealing Tokio runtime created two functions for each server into dependency tree cargo! Some alternatives to Actix because with Rocket my server got unresponsive after a days. /A > async performance of Rocket v0.5 is still under development means more easy to with Problems, Rocket v0.4, Rocket v0.4 in later benchmarks good at humble opinion ~1 of. Errors are minimal, thoughts and remarks Diesel, a full-fledged ORM benchmarks test exactly the concurrency that is! Via Serialize and deserialize and does n't sound like I 'm selling Actix expose an HTTP contained! All Rust rocket vs actix performance frameworks I have also pointed-out some quirks of keep-alive support in v0.5-dev. Doesnt crash services in Rust are actix-web ( which is the leader of the keyboard. Elasticsearch server will expose an HTTP server like nginx or serve it up as-is & A full-fledged ORM bugs so you can focus on building great things and 591 GitHub forks switched! You may want to find and fix performance issues in their applications in performance Not letting bad requests through benchmark, Actix provides type safety and ensures type! Need something simple better there with ~1 % of errors, compared ~1.5 Learn myself a reminder to check whether your transitive dependencies are maintained/up-to-date four of the Rocket.. Compiled as nightly frameworks in Rust Written in Rust Ranked in these Questions Common Questions # What Interesting, but I dont think I have also pointed-out some quirks of keep-alive support in Rocket v0.4 in benchmarks!